« Donna's Delicious Wedding Favors | Main | Hef and Holly Get Hitched - A Match Made at the Playboy Mansion »

Liz Hurley's Interfaith Marriage Contested by Traditionalists

Elizabeth HurleyBy Rev. Laurie Sue Brockway

Just a few words on the Liz Hurley and Arun Nayar nuptials in England and India.

I have one thing to say to all those who have been criticizing the way these two people in love have chosen to marry -- get over it!

They are an interfaith pair, who, like many interfaith couples have chosen to celebrate their love and their cultures by getting married in a way that honors both families and both traditions.

It is estimated that 25 percent of all marriages today are interfaith and there are more mixed couples when you count in intercultural and interracial pairs. The fact that people are complaining about the choices Liz and her new husband have made demonstrates prejudice and interference with a loving couple's personal choices. And it is not even the usual culprits -- mother of the bride or mother of the groom -- giving them such a hard time!

We hear a criminal complaint has been filed against the model and her businessman hubby, citing some archaic law against interfaith marriage. A Hindu traditionalist (ultra-conservatve) has cited "295a of the Indian Penal Code" which says it is against the law to marry in a Hindu ceremony if your are not a Hindu and if you put forth a "deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings." See Liz Hurley Branded a Criminal by Hindu Traditionalists.

This is nutty! It states Liz Hurley and Arun Nayar nuptials are technically illegal, which is even more ridiculous, especially since they were legally married in England before embarking on the second round of wedding rituals in India.

Some details: Model/actress Hurley, is British and born into the religious tradition of the Church of England. Businessman Nayar, a Hindu, was born in India to an Indian dad and non-Indian Mom.

Their first wedding experience was, as far as I can tell from initial reports, at the registrar's office to deal with the marital paperwork, which in England is still handwritten. This would be the attainment of their official marriage license. This is the protocol.

The Associated Press reported that the couple has a "Private civil ceremony at a 15th-century castle" and "were married at Sudeley Castle in Winchcombe, 125 miles west of London. The pair held a blessing and party at the castle Saturday evening."

Other reports contend they had a formal Church of England ceremony, which is very different from a civil ceremony.

The religious ceremony would have represented the tradition the Hurley family observes. The civil ceremony is the legal part -- and that would not happen at a Castle. This could only be at the registrars office. I would tend to believe the religious/spiritual ceremony -- or "blessing" -- was at the castle.

Following the ceremonies in England they headed to India. Sounded to me as if they followed the protocol of a Hindu ceremony typical for people of means -- groom arrived on a horse, there were fire eaters and lots of festivities. It was loud, crazy, colorful. This is how it is done. Hindu people -- even those with little money -- tend to whoop it up at weddings. The groom and bride wore traditional wedding apparel.

Andhracafe.com is reporting that the criminal complaint was filed against the couple because of the ceremony. The website states that because Hurley is of a different faith, and already was married in a religious ceremony according to that faith, that she and her new hubby made a mockery of the Hindu customs, and have hurt the religious sentiments of the community by marrying in Hindu style.

This is so unbelievably shocking and sad, as the Hindu tradtion does not require the bride to be of the same faith to partake in a Hindu ceremony and many Hindu priests will marry interfaith couples as well as couples from differest castes. There are still so many small-minded people who cannot accept this.

I am sure that Hurley and hubby created an over the top wedding celebrations, using enough money to feed half of India. The lavishness of the nuptials of the rich and famous is upsetting to some, especially in a country so poor. Perhaps it is this aspect of the wedding that stirred such controversy.

But that is not reason enough to attack the choices of an interfaith pair. It is completely commonplace for interfaith couples to honor their love and one another's cultures and religious with dual ceremonies. It is also extremely common these days for couples to have more than one wedding ceremony. Often times they will have a civil and religious ceremony, or a ceremony in one country and then another.

Furthermore, the Hindu culture values the "spiritual ceremony" as the true ceremony. It is the taking of the 7 Steps around the sacred fire that seals them as husband and wife forever. There are many, many Hindu people who have the spiritual ceremony without the legal aspect, because the samskara of marriage is the most important part. In the United States, Hindu couples reguarly have their spiritual ceremony and then go to the clerk's office to make it legal at another time.

It takes a lot of courage for couples of different faiths and cultures to follow their hearts and blend their lives, families and traditions.

I think any couple just starting out deserves the opportunity to marry the way they choose, and have their choices honored and celebrated. If they are brave enough to follow this path, why try to persecute them for their very personal decision?

© 2007, Reverend Laurie Sue Brockway

Rev. Laurie Sue Brockway is a leading interfaith and non-denominational wedding officiant. She creates unique ceremonies for couples of all backgrounds and faiths, and is also widely recognized as a relationship coach, bridal stress expert and columnist. She is author of WEDDING GODDESS: A Divine Guide To Transforming Wedding Stress into Wedding Bliss (Perigee Books, May 2005) and the new online course, Discover the Goddess. Visit Rev. Laurie Sue Brockway at www.WeddingGoddessWisdom.com.

Find a wide variety of wedding favors
and other wedding accessories. We
also have a large selection of favors
for any occasion.
Help others find this article: Digg It Digg It!, Reddit Reddit or Delicious Bookmark it!

Comments

I have read your article on interfaith marriage with a great interest. It is indeed welcome to support the good cause of interfaith marriages with undercurrent of God is Love, Love is same everywhere and furthermore that the soul makes no distinction between religion and culture. However, it had nothing to do with the conclusive statement that the country is poor. In any event, the so called 'tradionalist' is not opposing the interfaith marriage but is merely alleging the manner in which the same has been re-ceremonised after having been lawfully done in UK.

Regards

Arya

Hey, Chill out. Just like papparrazzi and tabloids are an integral part of the British culture, so is the habit of one-in-a-million eccentric initiating silly lawsuits against celebrities and film personalities under the guise of culture police. What you are witnessing is not a mass opinion, but someone trying to get their 5 seconds of fame.

Peace.

Rev.Laurie Sue Brockway, should really get her facts right before jumping to conclusions ! Firstly India is NOT A POOR COUNTRY, it is a clear known fact, that west only see's what it wants to see! And to make it myself more clear, India itself & it's future, will always be 'richer' then Europe, whether certain people like it or not!
I challenge this 'rev' to show me any one part of England,that has anything on the lines of such as, traditon, culture, respect, values, etc.... left! I don't think so somehow. But yes, I can show you many parts of India which have all those qualities and a hell of a lot more! I am a British Indian, although the 'British' part it such a shame to be.

Hi ,

IF you say india is so poor you are the poorest.

And what do you know about hindu culture.

If any body from the religion which doesnoty have any culture or traditions marries in another religious style , what they are doing they are trying to hurt the people of that religion.

This is anu pure act of vioalation from LIZ and family and some people like the reporters of this article.

And donot ever say that india is soo poor.


I totally agree with you on ewhat you had to say. It is sad that there are still so many people with such narrow mindedness. But as knowledgeble as you are you seem to be very condescending about India itself. That a wedding of this scale could have half of India. Weel that is totally outrageous ...and demeaning. It is like the same old practise of calling it the "third world" and as if everything that goes wrong is because of that..povertty and implying that it is because of jelousy that someone picked on this wedding. How would explain the ignorance in Western world and total cluelessness to certain religions....? Is it because that they are so rich, they dont need to worry about anything else? Hope you will understand.. You atleast seem well read and knowledgeable about India/

Just a few facts:
1) Arun Nayar is reported to have accepted Christanity before the Christian marriage (sorry cant find the news report)

2) They did not complete the Hindu ceremony. The DNA reports
"The couple was only able to take four turns around a ritual sacred wedding fire instead of the customary seven because their clothes kept getting entangled, reports said."
http://www.dnaindia.com/report.asp?NewsID=1084043

Now my opinion:

I wouldn't leave a wedding ceremony mid-way beacuse of something as mundane as entangled clothes. This points out to me that they were not celebrating their love but just playing to the gallery (its cool to have a Hindu wedding too , what if its incomplete)

Why did Nayar accept Christanity? Was it required for the wedding or was it his natural choice.

Before you think I am some sort of religious bigot. I am not. I dont give a damn what hurley-Nayar does. But thought somebody should voice the other side

I was about to give credibility of objective writing to Reverend Laurie Sue Brockway, but backed out when I read this:

"I am sure that Hurley and hubby created over the top wedding celebrations, using enough money to feed half of India. The lavishness of the nuptials of the rich and famous is upsetting to some, especially in a country so poor".

To feed half of India, ie. about 600 million people, leave alone poor Hurley, will be beyond the capability of even Bill Gates. Then the Reverend requires to research to find out "How really poor" is India.

I have nothing against rest of the article. Since one swallow does not make a winter, one stupid Indian litigant will not be the voice of all Hindus. By the way, the Hurley marriage was a "non-event" for the average billion plus Indians. The Reverend is positively biased in favour of Christians and against the rest of the religions, particularly Hinduism. If love is God, hatred is "Devil", and the reverend sure does possess the Devil.

BTW, I am having a inter-faith marriage and facing a lot of opposition

I would like to give that ultra conservative idiot a piece of my mind. Interfaith marriages happen every other day in India and I have seen couples get married in a church first and then in the traditional Hindu way. This is done essentially to respect each others culture. If this offends the ulta dumb traditionalists, then I would say India would be better off without such idiots.

Relax...With the sudden increase in the number of television "news" channels, almost any weird/ridiculous thing is telecast as news. And television footage being one thing that Indians crave for (or probably everyone for that matter), some groups stretch their imagination and do anything possible to get this footage!

Just to let you know, the Supreme Court of India recently, after seeing a huge number of silly complaints, asked the public not to file frivolous cases!!
The only thing i find weird is the kind of "tamasha" that sorrounded the entire marriage extravaganza. And three marriage ceremonies??

As an Indian, I feel nothing but contempt for those people who objected to the Hindu ceremony on the grounds that Liz is a non-Hindu. As anyone with half a brain knows, Hinduism isn't a religion but a way of life. And a highly evolved, open one at that. Anyone claiming that Hindu scriptures forbid the ceremony needs to understand the fact that in the first place, Hinduism has NO rule book or Bible which spells out rights and wrongs. There is no Koran, Bible or Talmud and Torah. The thing I love most about being a Hindu is that its all open to personal interpretation. The last thing we need is a minority of narrow-minded half-wits who call themselves Hindu and then condemn interfaith marriages. They are an embarassment to the faith they claim to belong to.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Email Entry

Interesting bits of information about getting married in Las Vegas. Gossip, sightings, the chapels and Elvis. No place marries you like Vegas.

Subscribe to this blog's feed
Add to: Google, My Yahoo, My MSN, My AOL
What is this?

Sections

Credits

Editorial Director
Pete Codella, APR

Editor
Rev. Laurie Sue Brockway

Contributors
Anthony Greno

Design Director
Dave Rosowsky

Wedlok Feeds

Google
Yahoo
MSN
My AOL
Newsgator
Bloglines
NewsBurst
MultiRSS
Las Vegas Wedding Chapels Guide

Wedlok, part of the Blogging Vegas Network, is owned and operated by Image Domain Inc and Codella Marketing LLC.
© 2006-2007
All rights reserved.
702.506.0465